807
I support the right of those who were commercial fishing in Greystones old harbour, when it closed for rebuilding, to continue. However the small scale of the new harbour means there is no space for expansion.
I remain concerned about the large biodiversity loss with fish depletion due to overfishing. The sea off Greystones had large quantities of fish and it was a major angling centre. The European Surf casting Championships being held in Greystones in 1989.
Whelk Fishery.
Sources.

Stop the traffic…
1 comment
FROM NIFA and NIFO…
The Cllrs’ response is downright misleading and based on a number of inaccuracies. Why any elected official would want to promote such blatant inaccuracies in order to tarnish the reputation of the local fishing community itself raises some serious questions that need to be answered
The species of whelk (nucella lapillus) or Dog Whelk, the Cllr referred to on the OSPAR endangered/threatened list is a completely different species of whelk to those landed by the fishing boats (buccinnm undatum) and to confuse the two is highly misleading, as is to suggest the local fishing boats are targeting an endangered/protected species.
In relation to the reference regarding undersize whelk being landed, landings are monitored at sea and ashore by both the Navy and the SFPA through a combination of boardings at sea and inspections at point of landing and at the factories where they are processed. The vessels have invested at their own cost in riddles and rotary graders, something they aren’t required to do to ensure any undersize whelk are returned to the sea alive as soon as possible
Yes most of the whelk landed are exported,after being processed where value is added mostly in a Co. Wexford factory which creates much additional employment. Surely enterprise that brings money into the country in this manner is something that should be supported, not assaulted by means of spreading misinformation
To blame these traditional fishing boats for biodiversity loss in the context of what fin fish is available for recreational anglers to catch is absurd when these boats don’t target fin fish or their food sources or have any impact on their habitat and is grossly inaccurate to say the least. Ironically a significant threat to the whelk referred to on the OSPAR site is contaminants found in anti fouling paint commonly applied to boats in commercial marinas
Further info: https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/bdc/species-habitats/list-of-threatened-declining-species-habitats/invertebrates/dog-whelk?fbclid=IwAR29aB8zi8GYfg-NOkSpW6nLt1HSq-Eb5bvWIw09a8tG-nWuYDHYpz_hQ5Q
Comments are closed.