To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
2 comments
I would like to know who removed the original cleats, was permission to remove the cleats sought, of whom, by whom and if not the cleats should be restored and whoever removed them brought to account. This is an ugly dispute, it is anti-fisherman and anti-Greystones, a village that always had its small fleet of fishermen.
Good luck to the fishermen. I’m not particularly into pleasure boating OR fishing – love the sea but from dry land!! I do honestly believe that any port around the country (and beyond such as UK, Greece, Spain …) is far more charming and attractive for everybody with fishing activity going on. Greystones harbour, as it is, is charmless and soulless. I find all the yachts jammed together in their reserved area quite vulgar, exclusive and ugly. Opening up the area to the fishermen might alleviate the blandness a little. Closing the pier off with a gate is outrageous and offensive to the town – a “closed-off pier” was never envisaged. Let people who want to fish fish and people who want to walk the pier walk!