395
The dual mandate was stopped twenty years ago; this was done to achieve better and more independent local government. Recently there has been a reversal of this through the back door.
Local government is being fully controlled from central government. This is done by the major parties using the ‘whip’ on their councillors. The executive is just an implementer of the department overview which is politically influenced by any government of the day. All of this leads to a deficit of democracy locally and does not serve the public well.
1. Monthly meetings reduced from 2 to 1.
Electile Dysfunction?
previous post

atest press release from Cllr
Tom Fortune, issued on Wednesday, April 2021…
Dear editor,

All of this should, if it is to continue, be under the control of the elected councillors who have the desire and skill sets to do this and who are elected by the public. The executive also needs to be more answerable to elected members.
Some TDs have put their personal assistants on to local authorities to replace them when they were elected to the Dail, which is really dual mandate through the back door. They are employees of the relevant TD and they operate accordingly. It is plain to see that they are there just to represent the TD.

We need to have an independent councillor organisation that mirrors the LGMA and have regular meetings with them. The Local Government Managers Association are an organisation that needs better oversight in the interests of better local democracy. Councillors need to be better paid. It is a full time role yet we are paid half the minimum wage. TDs have a package that is twenty times greater. We need a stronger and consistent relationship with independent senators.
This is all leading to a decline of local government and undermining of councillors.

